|
There's a moment that happens for a lot of us before we're fully awake. Before we've had water, before we've looked out the window, before we've noticed how we actually feel. We reach for our phone. I've done it many times. And for a long time I didn't think much of it. It's just what you do. But lately I've been sitting with a question that's hard to shake: what was I doing before that became automatic? What was I reaching toward before I started reaching for a screen? I've been thinking a lot about technology lately not in the way I usually think about it. Not apps, not AI, not the latest tool promising to save me time. I've been thinking about the technology that already exists inside of us. The capacities we were born with that quietly atrophied as faster, shinier external alternatives took their place. Here's the reframe that changed how I see all of it: technology isn't just digital. At its core, technology is the practical application of knowledge. Fire was technology. Speech was technology. The wheel was technology. And so is your ability to navigate, sense, feel, decide, and know things without consulting anything outside yourself. I call these internal technologies. And I'd argue they're the most sophisticated ones any of us own. The thing is, for most of human history, we didn't have a choice about developing them. Survival depended on it. Knowing which plants were safe to eat, reading the sky for weather, understanding the body language of someone who might be a threat. These weren't optional skills. They were life and death. We were, out of necessity, deeply connected to our internal technology. We're not in that world anymore. And in a lot of ways, that's a gift. But it also means we've arrived at a strange moment: for the first time in human history, developing our internal capacities is optional. We can outsource almost all of it. And many of us, without fully deciding to, have. I'm not writing this to tell you to throw out your GPS or stop using Google. I use both constantly. But I am inviting you to notice the exchange you're making and whether you're making it consciously. Because here's what I keep coming back to: every time we let an external tool do something our internal technology could do, we're making a choice. Sometimes that tradeoff is absolutely worth it. Sometimes it costs us more than we realize. The problem isn't the tool. It's that most of us have never stopped to ask the question. What would it look like to start asking it? This week's post goes deep on exactly this. The history of how we got here, what internal vs. external technology actually means, and the question I think is worth sitting with. I'd love for you to read it. š Harnessing the Technology Withinā Rachel
|
For people who are done letting outside voices ā technology, experts, cultural noise ā drown out their own. Every issue explores how to reclaim your discernment, your body awareness, and your creative authority across the parts of life that matter most: technology, relationships, wellness, work, and creativity.
I heard someone say this in a call with writers the other day. It's understandable to be resentful of large language models (LLMs) when you're a writer and see the market flood with AI generated content. It can feel discouraging. Especially when you take pride in your craft as a writer. I totally get it. However, the stance "anti-AI, pro-human" gives me pause. For one thing, are you sure you're anti-AI? Do you use Google to search information? Do you check the weather? Do you use Netflix or...
I've spent years watching people interact with technology they didn't fully understand. Not judging them. Studying them. Iām a user experience (UX) researcher and I make my living studying how our users interact with our products and translate that information to the team so they can make actionable decisions. I observe research participants navigate screens that my team created and talk through their confusion out loud. In the process, they reveal exactly what works and what doesn't. My job...
I travel a lot. Sometimes for work. Mostly for pleasure. And I love it. It's what I dreamed of being able to do when I was younger. And it's also challenging to stick to your ideal way of eating. There's always a balance because you want to experience the local cuisine and you also don't want to throw yourself off too much. You'll hear me talking a lot about the Three Zone Framework. I first developed it to help us have a way to relate to technology. Then I realized we can use it for...